

Loading the model and its source data…


Loading the model and its source data…
Covered-call / option-income ETF
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
DJIA owns the Dow 30 stocks and systematically writes index calls to generate monthly cash flow. The option premium comes with capped market upside, and the distribution rate should be read alongside NAV and total return rather than as a bond-like yield.
volatile payers swing payout to payout — the average smooths the starting point
Use 0% for IRA/Roth. Simplified: one flat rate, federal only.
Contributing $10,000 up front plus $250 a month for 15 years puts in $55,000 of your own money. Under these assumptions the position ends worth $109,267, averaging about $499 a month in gross distributions in its final year. That is a total gain of $54,267 (+99%) — about 7.3% a year, money-weighted, counting income and price together.
No scenario without its downside: these variants re-run your exact inputs through standard shocks so the base case never stands alone.
Every rate above is held constant for the whole projection — real markets never do that. This is a scenario, not a forecast.
| Year | Gross income | Contributed | Ending value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $795 | $13,000 | $13,915 |
| 2 | $1,052 | $3,000 | $18,128 |
| 3 | $1,324 | $3,000 | $22,656 |
| 4 | $1,611 | $3,000 | $27,518 |
| 5 | $1,914 | $3,000 | $32,734 |
| 6 | $2,234 | $3,000 | $38,324 |
| 7 | $2,571 | $3,000 | $44,308 |
| 8 | $2,927 | $3,000 | $50,710 |
| 9 | $3,301 | $3,000 | $57,552 |
| 10 | $3,695 | $3,000 | $64,858 |
| 11 | $4,109 | $3,000 | $72,653 |
| 12 | $4,544 | $3,000 | $80,964 |
| 13 | $5,001 | $3,000 | $89,817 |
| 14 | $5,481 | $3,000 | $99,242 |
| 15 | $5,985 | $3,000 | $109,267 |
| Ex-date | Pay date | Per share |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-23 | $0.1245 |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-25 | $0.1376 |
| 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-21 | $0.1489 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2026-04-23 | $0.1313 |
| 2026-03-23 | 2026-03-26 | $0.2091 |
| 2026-02-23 | 2026-02-26 | $0.1085 |
| 2026-01-20 | 2026-01-23 | $0.1686 |
| 2025-12-30 | 2026-01-07 | $0.4715 |
| 2025-12-22 | 2025-12-30 | $0.1173 |
| 2025-11-24 | 2025-12-02 | $0.2227 |
| 2025-10-20 | 2025-10-27 | $0.2199 |
| 2025-09-22 | 2025-09-29 | $0.1291 |
Launching soon — the calendar feed (.ics) works today.
Prefer no email? The calendar feed (.ics) carries the same dates.
The distribution rate annualizes recent payouts; the SEC 30-day yield measures net investment income under a standardized formula. For option-income funds the gap is normal — premiums and return of capital can fund distributions well above earned income. Neither number is a forecast of total return.
No. Its distributions depend on option premiums and market conditions, and funds like this have raised and cut payouts without notice. That's why this page's calculator includes a distribution-cut stress preset.
No — and it doesn't try. This is an educational scenario tool: it shows the arithmetic consequences of assumptions you choose. It makes no recommendations and no predictions.
The written index calls can cap gains above their strike during each option period. The exact tradeoff changes with option premiums and market moves, so it is visible only in the fund's total-return path, not its payout alone.
Applies to both sides. 0% = tax-advantaged.
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
$0.1245/share · latest payout
assumption — no issuer return history
assumption — variable option-income payout held flat
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
$0.4088/share · latest payout
assumption — no issuer return history
assumption — variable option-income payout held flat
Under these assumptions XYLD leads on both income and ending value. A clean sweep usually means the growth assumptions strongly favor one side — before reading anything into it, ask whether that side’s implied combined payout and price-growth assumptions over 10 years are realistic. Nudge the growth fields above and watch how fast the sweep disappears.
Both sides run the identical deposit schedule with DRIP on and taxes off (0% — set a rate above for taxable accounts). Growth defaults come from each fund’s own record where available (payout history; issuer-reported returns) — but history is not a forecast, and this is not a recommendation.
Educational scenario modeling only — not investment, tax, or financial advice. Results are hypothetical outcomes of your assumptions, not forecasts.