

Loading the model and its source data…


Loading the model and its source data…
Comparison
TSLY and NVDY use weekly synthetic covered-call strategies on TSLA and NVDA, so their cash flows remain tied to different single-stock risks.
TSLY creates synthetic TSLA exposure and sells calls against it; NVDY applies that approach to NVDA. Each fund concentrates its market exposure in one company while using option premium to support weekly distributions. The call overlay limits participation in some upward moves but does not remove the referenced stock's downside. As of July 15, 2026, TSLY's issuer-sourced price was $26.80 and NVDY's was $12.83. A lower share price is not evidence of a higher income rate or a stronger total-return record.
TSLY reported a 50.31% distribution rate and a 1.07% SEC 30-day yield. NVDY reported a 39.03% distribution rate and a 1.09% SEC yield. The distribution rate annualizes recent cash payments; SEC yield follows a standardized net-investment-income calculation. For option-income funds, premiums and return-of-capital classifications can support distributions that are much larger than SEC yield. The figures answer different questions, and neither predicts future payouts or total return.
Across the latest 12 recurring events, TSLY paid $3.8114 per share, averaging $0.31762 with amounts from $0.2593 to $0.5165. NVDY paid $1.5113, averaging $0.12594 with amounts from $0.0963 to $0.2072. Those totals increased 9.09% and 9.53%, respectively, from the preceding 12-event windows. Both latest events were dated July 16, 2026: $0.2593 for TSLY and $0.0963 for NVDY. Event-to-event history can move sharply and is not a forecast or a smooth annual growth rate.
TSLY's expense ratio was 1.07%, compared with 1.09% for NVDY. Their trailing return-of-capital shares were 65% and 42%. Return of capital generally reduces an investor's tax basis instead of being current investment income, subject to final tax reporting; it is not free money and is not automatically evidence of a defective distribution. The practical distinction in this stored data is the referenced company: TSLA outcomes drive one side and NVDA outcomes drive the other, while both retain weekly payout variability and capped-upside mechanics.
AI-assisted analysis · generated 2026-07-17 from each fund’s stored, issuer-sourced data · reviewed structure, not advice
Applies to both sides. 0% = tax-advantaged.
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
$1.1236/share · weekly, modeled monthly · latest payout
assumption — no issuer return history
assumption — variable option-income payout held flat
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
$0.4173/share · weekly, modeled monthly · latest payout
assumption — no issuer return history
assumption — variable option-income payout held flat
Under these assumptions TSLY leads on both income and ending value. A clean sweep usually means the growth assumptions strongly favor one side — before reading anything into it, ask whether that side’s implied combined payout and price-growth assumptions over 10 years are realistic. Nudge the growth fields above and watch how fast the sweep disappears.
Both sides run the identical deposit schedule with DRIP on and taxes off (0% — set a rate above for taxable accounts). Growth defaults come from each fund’s own record where available (payout history; issuer-reported returns) — but history is not a forecast, and this is not a recommendation.
| TSLY | NVDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $26.33 (as of 2026-07-16) | $12.57 (as of 2026-07-16) |
| Fund type | Covered-call / option-income ETF | Covered-call / option-income ETF |
| Strategy | Synthetic covered calls on a single stock (TSLA) | Synthetic covered calls on a single stock (NVDA) |
| Payout frequency | weekly | weekly |
| Distribution rate | 51.2% | 39.8% |
| 30-day SEC yield | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 1.09% |
| Trailing ROC share | 65% | 42% |
| Latest payout | $0.2593 (ex 2026-07-16) | $0.0963 (ex 2026-07-16) |
| Inception | — | — |
TSLY YieldMax ETFs (issuer data) · NVDY YieldMax ETFs (issuer data)
The analysis above is AI-assisted, grounded only in each fund’s stored issuer data, and educational — it makes no recommendation and no prediction. Educational scenario modeling only — not investment, tax, or financial advice. Results are hypothetical outcomes of your assumptions, not forecasts.